Saturday, August 13, 2022
LA City Council Approves New Council District Borders to Be In Effect Jan. 1
By City News Service
Published December 10, 2021


The Los Angeles City Council today approved the  new borders for the city’s 15 council districts, which will go into effect on  Jan. 1. 

The measure passed by a 13-0 margin, with Councilman Joe Buscaino 
absent and Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas suspended following his indictment on 
federal corruption charges. 


The council took over the redistricting process from the civilian City 
Council Redistricting Commission, which submitted recommendations to 
council members on Oct. 21. The 21 commissioners used data from the U.S. Census 
to update the city’s districts, with each council member getting about 260,000 
people to represent. 

The draft map made drastic changes to the current 15 council  districts, including creating an entirely new district that would have been  represented by either Councilman Paul Krekorian or Councilwoman Nithya Raman  without any of their previous constituents. 

When it reached the council for its portion of the redistricting  process, Council President Nury Martinez blasted the map, saying Los Angeles  “cannot reasonably move forward” with a draft map that “raises concerns for  so many marginalized communities.” 

Council members introduced dozens of changes to the borders, creating  a hybrid map that was advanced out of the council’s Ad Hoc Redistricting  Committee. The map then underwent two state-required public hearings in  November. 

The map received praise from some constituents for uniting Koreatown  under Council District 10 and Hollywood under Council District 13. Other  Angelenos called in to oppose the map for dividing their neighborhoods,  specifically Studio City and Reseda. Under the map, Studio City is split  between Council Districts 2 and 4, and Reseda is divided among Council  Districts 3 and 4. 

“I don’t know why you’re splitting valley communities if they have  similar interests and similar demographics, they go to similar stores and  business? Why split Studio City, why split Reseda? Keep them all together,” a  caller who identified himself as Kenneth said. 


Studio City Neighborhood Council Vice President Scott Mandell urged  Krekorian to introduce an amendment to the map that would give Council District  2 the entirety of Studio City. 

“We want to remain whole, we want to remain in the same council  district with the same council member we voted for,” Mandell said.  Several people called in to oppose the map for not returning assets  previously held by Council District 8. 

Exposition Park — which includes Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, the  Natural History Museum and Banc of California Stadium — was located in Council  District 8 for decades until the redistricting process a decade ago, when it  was moved, along with USC, to Council District 9. 

Councilman Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who represents Council District 8,  made multiple attempts to move the assets back into his district. 

“USC and Expo Park, which has been in the Eighth District for longer  than most of the council has been alive, got taken out of the Eighth District  and put in the Ninth District,” Harris-Dawson told council members on Nov. 23. 

“You can’t not fight for this. I cannot walk out of here not having  put this before each and every one of you,” he told council members. “At  least the African American Museum ought to be in the one Black district,” he added. 

His final motion to move the assets into Council District 8 failed,  only receiving the support of three council members — Harris-Dawson,  Councilman Mike Bonin and Raman. 

Councilman Curren Price, who represents the Council District 9, said  he “vehemently opposed” moving Exposition Park out of his district. “The  fact is, CD9 is still the most impoverished district in the city … of both  Black and brown folks, but still the most impoverished and it certainly doesn’t  make sense to take assets from a district that’s showing some progress, some  development,” Price said. 

The City Council also approved amendments from Raman to restore part  of her district, but her office says she is still losing about 40% of her  constituents under the current proposal. 

The council’s significant changes to the civilian commission’s  recommended map came amid calls from many — including the commission itself —  to change the city’s policy in the future to allow an entirely independent body handle the redistricting process. 

In the commission’s recommendations submitted to the council, it  called for an independent body to redraw the borders in 2031. 

“This commission over the last year confirmed that the quasi- independent nature of the advisory commission simply does not work,”  commission Chairman Fred Ali told council members. “It’s time for an  independent, rather than advisory, commission to assume responsibility for  redistricting for the good of our city.” 

Ali told council members on Nov. 2 that 15,000 people offered comment during the process, but he noted challenges during the process, including the  COVID-19 pandemic, census data being delayed by five months and a “historic  undercount of certain communities” within that data. 

Martinez said the commission’s map reflected an undercount she attributed to the Trump administration’s failed attempt to add a citizenship  question to the census and to what she called the former president’s confusing  messaging on the census’ deadline. 

“Los Angeles’ numbers are simply not accurate. Look around you, we  did not get whiter and we did not get wealthier. This is not the Los Angeles  that I see around me,” Martinez said. 

Categories: Local | News | Political
Tags: | | | |

Get the Los Angeles Sentinel App!

Since 1933 The Voice of Our Community Speaking for Itself.
89 Years of LA Sentinel.
Black News.

Daily Brief

LA Sentinel
in your pocket:


LA Watts Times

© 2022 Los Angeles Sentinel All Rights Reserved • A Bakewell Media Publication

AboutArchivesContact UsCorrections & MisprintsMedia Kit

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

LA Watts TimesTaste of Soul

Close / I'm already on the list

Subscribe Today!

Don't be limited anymore! Subscribe Now »

** Existing subscribers, please Login / Register for Digital »

Subscribe to The Los Angeles Sentinel for only $5.99 $3.99 per month, with 1 month free!

Relax in comfort each week as you read the printed newspaper on your own time, delivered weekly to your home or office. This subscription also includes UNLIMITED DIGITAL ACCESS for all of your devices. Includes FREE shipping! One easy payment of $3.99/month gets you:

Subscribe Now »